Exact repetition: everything stays
In the Mozart theme from Lesson 1, mm. 7–8 keep all four features of mm. 5–6. That is unity at its strongest. It is useful in small doses, but a motive repeated exactly again and again becomes predictable.
Exact repetition creates unity. Variation keeps an idea recognizable while changing something about it.
Each section below is labeled with the target it teaches. The questions and your Noteflight task practice every target.
Inquirer · Thinker — Thinking: investigate how small musical ideas can grow into something larger through repetition and change.
Use what you're learning to complete the Noteflight task below, then check your own work before moving on.
Inquiry: How much can a motive change before it stops being recognizable as the same idea?
Reflect: What did “Repeat It or Change It?” teach you about your own composing choices?
When a motive returns, listeners compare it with the original, usually without realizing it. Whatever stays the same connects the two statements and creates unity; whatever changes creates variety. To explain what stays the same, check four features in order: the rhythm, the directions of the moves, the size of each move (step, skip, or leap), and the pitches themselves.
In the Mozart theme from Lesson 1, mm. 7–8 keep all four features of mm. 5–6. That is unity at its strongest. It is useful in small doses, but a motive repeated exactly again and again becomes predictable.
When Beethoven’s motive returns in m. 3, the rhythm stays (short, short, short, long), the directions stay (repeat, repeat, down), and the size of the drop stays (a 3rd). Only the pitch level changes: everything starts one step lower. Keeping three features is why you recognize it instantly.
A variation changes one feature of a motive on purpose and keeps the rest. Each technique below is named for what it changes. Two examples are from real music; the other two apply the technique to the course motive from Lesson 1 (G–G–C–B–A–G) so you can compare directly. Play each one.
In the second half of Petzold’s Minuet in G, a one-measure idea (a quarter note, then four eighths stepping down) is stated, then immediately restated one step lower. Rhythm, directions, and step sizes stay; only the starting pitch moves. In m. 7 the pattern breaks: the line turns upward and pauses on a held note, which tells the listener the sequence is over. Sequences are one of the most common ways composers extend a motive.
The course motive’s pitches stay exactly the same, but every note value is doubled: eighths become quarters, quarters become halves. The idea now fills two measures and sounds broader and calmer. You could also change only some values; the pitches are what hold it together.
The rhythm and the two repeated Gs stay. After them, every direction flips: the leap up a 4th becomes a leap down a 4th, and the steps down become steps up. The motive’s shape is now reversed, but its rhythm still identifies it.
In the third phrase of “Ode to Joy,” Beethoven repeats a one-measure idea and changes only its last note, C to D. A changed ending can redirect a motive: in Unit 3 you used the same technique to turn a question into an answer.
Every variation has to pass one test: will a listener still hear it as the motive? Decide with evidence, not a feeling. Name the features that stayed the same. A reliable guideline: change one feature at a time, and keep either the rhythm or the directions. When both change, the result almost always sounds like a new idea.
The contour variation changes the directions but keeps the rhythm (short, short, long, short, short, long) and the two repeated Gs at the start. Evidence: two of the four features stay, including the rhythm, so the motive is still audible.
This version changes the rhythm (quarter, half, quarter), the directions (it starts high and only descends), and every pitch. Nothing of the original survives, so a listener hears it as new material, not a variation.
Here is the course motive followed by one example of each technique. Read each variation against the original in m. 1 and ask the same two questions every time: what changed, and what stayed?
| Version | What changed | What stayed |
|---|---|---|
| m. 2 (sequence) | Pitch level: every note one step higher | Rhythm, directions, sizes of moves. Yes: only the pitch level moved |
| m. 3 (contour) | Directions after the repeated Gs | Rhythm, the repeated-G opening, a 4th followed by steps. Yes, though least obviously: the rhythm identifies it |
| m. 4 (ending) | Last two notes: up to D, then C | Rhythm and the first four notes. Yes: it starts exactly like the motive |
| mm. 5–6 (rhythm) | Rhythm: every value doubled | Pitches, directions, sizes. Yes: the pitch pattern is intact |
Model description: Each variation changes one feature of the motive and keeps the rest. The sequence moves the whole motive up a step, keeping its rhythm and pattern of moves, so it is the most obviously related. The rhythmic variation keeps every pitch but doubles each value, so it sounds broader while the pitch pattern gives it away. The contour variation keeps the rhythm and the repeated Gs but flips the directions after them; it is the least obvious, but the rhythm still identifies it. The changed ending keeps the first four notes exactly and turns up to close on C instead of stepping down to G, so an open ending becomes a closed one.
The description gives the same two-part evidence for every version: what changed and what stayed. That is the evidence you will cite when you decide whether your own variations are recognizable.
Pick an answer for each question. You will see right away whether you are correct and why.
0 of 6 correct
1When Beethoven’s motive returns in m. 3, what stays the same?
2Each excerpt is the course motive followed by a variation. Play both. In which is the variation a sequence?
3Listen only. The course motive plays, then a variation. Which feature did the variation change?
4Listen, then choose which excerpt you heard.
5Is the second measure a recognizable variation of the course motive?
6Is m. 2 of this Minuet excerpt a recognizable variation of m. 1? Choose the answer with the best evidence.
Write your own motive, then treat it the way the worked example treats the course motive: copy it and change one feature each time. You are building a set of options you will use in Composition 4.
Create a 1–2 measure motive. Copy it three times and make a different type of change each time.
Start on a different pitch; keep the rhythm and every direction and size.
Keep the pitches; change some or all of the note values.
Keep the rhythm; flip the direction of one or more moves.
Keep the start; change the last note or two.
Before you change anything, write down your motive’s identity: its rhythm and its pitch pattern. For each copy, note what you are keeping.
Play the original and each variation back to back. Each one should change one feature. If two things changed, decide whether you meant it.
For each variation, decide whether it is still recognizable and write one sentence of evidence that names what stayed the same, like the worked-analysis table.
To make each copy, select your motive’s measures and copy (⌘ C on a Mac, Ctrl C on Windows or a Chromebook). Click the measure where the copy should start and paste (⌘ V / Ctrl V), then change only the feature you are varying.
0 of 6 checked
Finish the Noteflight work above, then mark this lesson done when you finish.